Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
All Posts
Conversion Rate Optimization
CueForGood Case Studies
Google Analytics
Google Search Console
Online Marketing
Pay Per Click
Social Media Marketing
Staff Favourites
Sustainable Marketing
Technical SEO
Usability and Accessibility
UX Design
Web Development

Will Google ban websites using paid links?

The Internet has been flooded with link directories and link farms that are providing links for free (in return of another link – nothing comes for free these days!) or for a certain fee (does this qualify as a paid link?.)

Its quite understandable that Google doesn’t like it. Artificial inflation of links just doesn’t serve the purpose. The SERP results are then not in control of an algo but in control of the individuals who can build maximum links!

It hurts. But can reporting paid links help?

How do you find out if the votes are genuine or bought?
Is Yahoo directory selling links (its a paid directory – how do you know that people want a link from yahoo directory because of th PR value of that page and not really the traffic coming from there)?
What about other link building directories? How can you find out the purpose for paying for a link? Is text ad a paid link? What about directories that allow free inclusions provided a linkback is provided?

Thats brings us to SEM companies. Are they promoting paid links? Is reciprocal linking paid? No money is being exchanged between parties – only link swapping. But the SEM company is getting paid to carry out the link building campaigns. So, whose selling links and whose buying links here? And how will a computer program come to a conclusion that the link bought was with the intention of increasing traffic and not PR.

I believe one can argue that if traffic is the sole purpose, use javascripts, iframe etc for sending out the link. But why should a webmaster do that? For the sole reason that otherwise, Google “might” think that its a paid link created with an “intention” to increase PR?

Before Search Engines, links were the only source of traffic movement. Anyone today with a PR of 6 on the homepage is (assuming) getting good traffic. So if the webmaster decides to sell links from his homepage to make some money, is he violating Google’s quality guidelines? If another webmaster buys that link in hope of getting traffic from that website, is he too violating Google’s quality guidelines?

How do you know what the intention behind the buying/selling of the link was?

I’m curious to see if any website makes news for buying/selling links.

Can you have your competitor banned by going and buying links for their website on their behalf and then reporting them?

Show Comments

2 Replies to “Will Google ban websites using paid links?”

  1. The notion of paid links is not new. The question is how do you define a paid link? It’s proven (as you know) that old fahion one way link building improves rankings. Can a competitor determine that certain links were bought? Maybe, but it’s not very likely in many cases unless a competitor really has an ax to grind and has the resources to do it. The best links now are natural links from content people linked to because they wanted to. This means blog and social networking content are the best places to get links that will be indexed favorably by search engines.

Comments are closed.